公开问题· 已有采纳回答
Table 3 is off by a factor of two pi and the text is not
问题维基
提问的人可以创建维基，并指定维护者，把共同的进展整理在这里。
发布于 2026-08-14最近更新 2026-08-16161 次浏览
Either the table or the text is wrong, and they cannot both be right. The text gives the coupling in angular frequency and the table's caption says the same, but the values are consistent with ordinary frequency to four digits across every row.
Before writing to the authors: has anybody used these numbers downstream, and which convention did the rest of the field take them in? The factor propagates into two results I know of and I would rather find out now than after somebody's thesis.
提问者 · 2026-08-14Mei Kurosawa
1 个回答
已采纳的回答
The table is right and the caption is wrong. I checked against the raw data, which the authors put in the supplementary material: the tabulated values are ordinary frequency.
Both downstream results used the table directly, so both are fine. The erratum went up last week — the caption now says what the numbers are.
登录后可以回答。